Find a Grave vs. BillionGraves: which to use

The two big volunteer cemetery databases answer the same question differently. Find a Grave asks “who is buried here, and what do we know about them?” BillionGraves asks “what exactly is on that stone, and where does it stand?” Neither is better overall. Each wins in a specific situation, and the situation is usually visible before you search.

The data, contrasted

Find a Grave is a memorial database. Volunteers build a page per person — name, dates, sometimes an obituary, family links — and attach a photo of the stone when one exists. It is enormous: the site reports memorials in the hundreds of millions, with real depth in the United States and growing coverage abroad.

BillionGraves is a photograph database. Volunteers take GPS-tagged pictures of headstones, and the records inherit the coordinates. The site is far smaller than Find a Grave in raw counts, and its US coverage concentrates where scanning events have happened — Utah and other volunteer-heavy states are strong, other states are thin.

That one structural difference drives everything else.

When Find a Grave wins

Find a Grave wins on person-level research. The family links alone — parents, spouses, children — often reconstruct three generations of a family from one memorial. The linked obituaries fill in the biography. And for a person with an unusual name, the search-by-name path is simply fast.

It also wins on coverage of older cemeteries. Its volunteers transcribe legible stones and old county records alike, so a cemetery that lacks a single surviving stone may still have entries drawn from a transcribed register.

When BillionGraves wins

BillionGraves wins the moment you are physically at the cemetery. Type the cemetery name, and the map shows you exactly which stones have been photographed and where they lie. You are no longer reading a list; you are walking a grid with a checklist.

It also wins on epigraphy. Its records preserve the stone as photographed, at coordinates, which matters when a memorial page on Find a Grave contains four different death dates from four transcriptions and you need the stone itself to adjudicate.

The paywall caveat: on BillionGraves, search and the map are free, but viewing the full memorial details typically requires a subscription. Budget for it, or accept that the free tier confirms existence rather than details.

The annoying overlaps

The two databases share sources, so the same family history lives in both, sometimes with conflicting dates. When they disagree, treat the most recent photo as the better evidence and the cemetery office as the final say. No volunteer database is a primary source. Both will cheerfully confirm a stone that says one thing while the county death certificate says another.

The realistic workflow

For a name, dates, and a family picture: Find a Grave first, every time. For a location you can visit: pull the BillionGraves map, then verify the stone in person or against its photo. For a veteran: run the VA Nationwide Gravesite Locator before either of them, because the VA dataset is official and dates to the day the government placed the stone.

One search ends the debate for most people — the person you are looking for simply appears in one database and not the other. That is the honest answer to the headline question: use the one that has the record, and to find out which one that is, you search both.

Where to go next

FCRA notice. CNTA is not a consumer reporting agency. The services and records described on this page must not be used for employment, tenant screening, credit, or insurance decisions. See our disclaimer for the full notice.